Saturday, November 24, 2012

Rwanda seeks independence from foreign aid

              Residents of Sake flee fighting between M23 rebels and government troops in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo. Photograph: Dai Kurokawa/EPA

Since our readings this week are discussing the effects of foreign aid in Africa, I decided to follow a story in Rwanda, where foreign aid is being called ‘poison’ by its president, Paul Kagame. The president is pushing Rwanda to stop receiving foreign aid because he said that it is adversely affecting the growth of Rwanda’s economy. About 45% of Rwanda’s national budget comes from foreign aid, as the state has been unable to recover from the genocide in the 1990’s which left the economy in shambles.
According to an article from World News Australia, Kagame has created the Agaciro Development Fund (agaciro meaning ‘dignity’ and ‘pride’), which the government believes will jumpstart the Rwandan economy and end its dependence on foreign aid. The Agaciro Development Fund was initiated in August by Kagame and is based off of the contributions of Rwandan citizens. Elected officials are going door-to-door to collect money from citizens and the article reports that Rwandans are being somewhat shamed into contributing as much if not more than their neighbors. Public servants are giving up as much as one tenth of their salaries to the fund, others are contributing through text messages, the Internet, and through banks. Since August, the Agaciro Development fund has raised 22 billion Rwandan Francs or $35 million, which will be put towards development and electricity infrastructure in the rural parts of Rwanda.
Britain, a solid ally to Rwanda, has £21 million in aid waiting to be sent to Rwanda next month. However, Britain is debating whether to suspend this aid as did the U.S., the Netherlands and Germany, due to a UN report saying that Rwanda may be aiding the M23 rebel army in the conflict occurring currently in the eastern DRC.
Despite the possible corrupt usage of funding, I think that this is a step in the right direction for Rwanda since half of its budget comes from outside sources. As we have learned, many African states have not instituted a taxation system and cannot create federal funds. It sounds like Rwandans are contributing for the pride of their nation, but unless they see results from their givings, this movement may end up failing. The Rwandan government has to invest in infrastructure and sustain the funds by creating jobs, securing education, and making solid investments. 

Sources:

"Rwandans Try to Free Themselves from 'poison' of Foreign Aid." World Crunch. World News Australia, 20 Nov. 2012. Web. 24 Nov. 2012. <http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/1713081/Rwandans-try-to-free-themselves-from-poison-of-for>.

Borger, Julian, and David Smith. "UK May Cut Rwanda Aid over Support for DRC Rebels." The Guardian. Guardian News and Media, 22 Nov. 2012. Web. 24 Nov. 2012. <http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/nov/22/uk-rwanda-aid-drc-rebels>
 




Change of Plans For South African AIDS Policy




This article pertains to the AIDS crisis in Africa, specifically South Africa, and how the government's policy has shifted under the new administration to address it. South Africa's current president Jacob Zuma is the first leader of South Africa to publicly address the link between HIV and AIDS and as such has allocated a considerably greater portion of the government's resources to help those citizens who are infected and to stop its spread. The government has doubled the amount of HIV drugs it administers to the public and has loosened the requirements for the drugs so as to allow more access. South Africa has an infection rate of over 10% and Zuma's shift in policy represents one of the first real initiatives by an African government to address the AIDS crises that has devastated the continent.

I chose this article because the shift in health policy that its reporting on is significant for the future of the epidemic. The shift in policy by Africa's most powerful country could have far reaching effects and could perhaps signal a continent wide shift in attitudes about AIDS and how to combat it. It is an important issue not only from a healthcare standpoint but also because HIV/ AIDS' prevalence in Africa has caused dire economic consequences, leading to a net economic loss of 1% annually in many countries.

Given that AIDS is such a new epidemic, there are very few political science observations that apply to it. It has not significantly factored into the composition of African governments beaus it has by-and-large been ignored by them due to ignorance, social conservatism, or indifference. The only result on the political level is that South Africa's more progressive and pragmatic stance may further politicize the ways in which AIDS is combated at the government level. If there are tangible results in South Africa, other African leaders may face increased pressure to address the problem.

From a public policy standpoint,the painfully obvious course of action for leaders in Sub-Saharan Africa should be to administer as many drugs and condoms as fiscally possible and to improve education and access to education with regards to HIV/ AIDS.

Article: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-15854793

Friday, November 16, 2012

Oil Fuels Corruption In Equatorial Guinea

French police seized a six story mansion belonging to the son of Equatorial Guinea leader, Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo, as part of an investigation into money laundering (BBC). The corruption charges were brought forth by the anti-corruption agency, Transparency International. The organization suspects Mr. Obiang, as well his father and several other African leaders, of using the state's assets to acquire property in France (Transparecny International). The seized mansion is valued at 150 million euros. Around this time last year the French government confiscated some fifteen luxury cars from Teodorin Nguema Obiang Mangue, worth an estimated 70 million euros (BBC). This story alone exemplifies the vast extent at which rulers utilize wealth from resources for their own personal gains at the expense of their country. The resource curse is all too relevant in this story. Equatorial Guinea struck it rich by finding oil in the late 1990's, but the government wasn't ready for a sudden increase in monitory supply.  Sadly, like most countries that find oil reserves, they gave into corruption and became fiscally irresponsible. The country's population of 750,000 lives in poverty while their leaders parade around in mansions and drive 15 plus cars. On another note, last year in Equatorial Guinea the first ever elections took place, and Africa's longest standing leader retained power with 95% of the vote (BBC). This last example shows how corruption is embedded in practically every element of the Equatorial Guinea government. I'm proud of the French for stepping in and attempting to make a point of the extreme corruption in the Equatorial Guinea government. To further the idea of combating corruption, countries around the world should stop sending crates of foreign aid to countries that have corrupt political leaders. Another way to eliminate corruption would be to instill strong institutions with the power of regulating the wealth that comes with oil production. 


                                This is the 6 story mansion by Teodorin Nguema Obiang Mangue

References: 
"Paris Villa of Equatorial Guinea Leader's Son Obiang Seized." BBC News. BBC, 08 Sept. 2012. Web. 16 Nov. 2012. <http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-19120379>. 

"Biens Mal Acquis" Case: Teodorin Obiang Refuses to Appear before Judicial Authorities." Press Releases -. N.p., n.d. Web. 16 Nov. 2012. <http://www.transparency.org/news/pressrelease/20120713_biens_mal_acquis_case_teodorin_obiang_refuses_to_appear>.

Yellow Fever Kills 107 in Darfur Region


A yellow fever outbreak in Sudan's Darfur region has killed 107 people in the last six weeks; the World Health Organization warns that the disease could spread to the rest of the country. The death toll is gradually climbing; officials reported that 67 people had died just last week from the outbreak. There is no medicinal cure for yellow fever, which is spread by female mosquitoes. Doctors can treat the main symptoms - dehydration, fever, bleeding and vomiting - and hope for the viral infection to pass.
As part of the emergency response program, 2.4 million doses of the yellow fever vaccine are scheduled to arrive in the Sudanese capital next week. More than 350 suspected cases of yellow fever have been reported in Darfur since late September, and more than 30 per cent of people showing symptoms have died, according to a WHO statement. Majority of the infected are under the age of 29.
Sudan health ministry says that the disease is “definitely spreading” to new remote areas of Darfur, where Sudan's government has been battling rebel groups since 2003. More than 300,000 people have been killed in the conflict, and health care services are unavailable to most residents as a result of the turmoil. The recent heavy rain season in Darfur, created additional breeding sites for the disease-carrying mosquitoes, where the disease thrives in hot-humid environments.
This is a very dangerous warning flag for Sudan, because of the conflict rebels will not want to leave their fellow rebels to get a yellow fever shot. I would tell a policy maker to get multiple teams to go into these remote areas, to promote and provide the vaccine. This is not a viable answer with so much conflict going on in Darfur, much less, who would volunteer. I don’t see this problem going away any time soon, the instability of the country does not allow for rapid dispersion of medicine. Sudan will have to be creative in attempts to contain and stop Yellow fever, from spreading.

Article Link:  http://www.aljazeera.com/news/africa/2012/11/20121113181553383429.html

Corruption in Kenya

I wanted to post this article because I found it pretty awful.  It is one thing when politicians are corrupt, when they steal money from the public and force people to live in poverty as they live lavishly. However, this article is about the corruption of police officers - the very people who are supposed to keep you safe.  In my mind, when a politician is corrupt, the public can take safe haven with the police officers who are there for the public's safety.  Yet, here are a few quotes from the article: "'On a scale of 1 to 10, I would give our police a 2,' said Macharia Njeru, the chairman of Kenya’s new police oversight board, citing corruption allegations, human rights abuses, extrajudicial killings, failed inquiries and lost public trust." Or, "In just one five-month period in 2007, the report said, the police were suspected of killing hundreds of people." How about, "The national police service has intentionally been kept weak for decades so it could be manipulated by politicians." As someone who is planning to travel back to Kenya, this article has unearthed a new fear that, unfortunately, is very very real.

Article link: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/16/world/africa/killing-of-student-further-sullies-kenyan-police.html?hp

Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Guinea Bissau: Drug Haven

Last Spring, the small country of Guinea Bissau experienced a military coup in which the president was ousted just months before his term was set to expire. Since then drug trafficking has been ignored if condoned by the military brass leading the country.

“They are probably the worst narco-state that’s out there on the continent,” said a senior Drug Enforcement Administration official in Washington

Since the military takeover Guinea Bissau has been a hot spot for drug smuggling. Due to the countries location on Africa's western shore, it provides a convenient refueling spot a refuge for small drug running planes as they fly their route between Latin America and Europe. Since taking over the army has instituted a figure head to retain the appearance of stability, but it is the military that is calling the shots. The instability was intensified when several army officers defected and tried to launch a counter-coup, but it was squashed. Some experts suspect that the coup was a cover up for a flurry of drug smuggling activity that took place while the attention was on the government.
“There has clearly been an increase in Guinea-Bissau in the last several months,” said Pierre Lapaque, head of the regional United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime for West and Central Africa. “We are seeing more and more drugs regularly arriving in this country.”

Some have implicated that leaders in the military are behind the drug running activities. A senior D.E.A. official said, “People at the highest levels of the military are involved in the facilitation” of trafficking, and added: “In other African countries government officials are part of the problem. In Guinea-Bissau, it is the government itself that is the problem.” Even those within the country recognize the problem. “A lot of the traffickers have direct relationships with the military." Said Octávio Inocêncio Alves, the country;s former prosecutor general. What this means for Guinea Bissau is uncertain, but the country is clearly not headed in a positive direction. With the government itself sanctioning the drug lords it will be very hard to quell the problem without regime change. As the Military brass continues to cement it's hold on leadership this grows increasing unlikely.

Sources
Nossiter, Adam. New York Times. 11/1/12. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/02/world/africa/guinea-bissau-after-coup-is-drug-trafficking-haven.html?hp

Fighting the Rise of Radical Islam in Mali

African leaders meeting at an emergency summit yesterday



One issue facing Africa, and potentially the world as whole, which does not seem to get a ton of attention is the rise of radical jihadist in the continent, particularly in northeast Africa. The widespread political unrest and lawlessness of much of the continent make for ideal staging grounds for these Islamist radicals while all the poverty and poor quality of living and the relatively high proportion of Muslims already on the continent (52%) helps their recruiting efforts. They are further aided by the fact that much of the foreign effort to curb extremism is centered in the Middle East. 
Yesterday, a coalition of 15 West African countries known as ECOWAS (Economic Community of West African States)  agreed to send 3,300 troops into Mali, the northern portion of which (an area roughly the size of France) is now controlled by various Jihadist groups, some with links to al-Qaeda, following a coup this past spring. The radicals did not directly play a role in the coup but nonetheless used it to seize some power. All together about two thirds of Mali, once a beacon of stability and democracy, is under the control of these radical rebel groups. As we’ve seen through other countries, coup d’états can be a good thing, but often they just lead to chaos and can undermine the democracy, freedom, prosperity, and security of a country and even its neighbors.
This plan for intervention spawned from an emergency summit in Nigeria  that was aimed at addressing extremism in the region. The plan developed by this coalition will eventually be brought before the African Union and the UN Security Council for approval. The UN, also concerned about the happenings in Mali, had previously tasked leaders with developing a plan to retake the occupied territory. These armed forces, mainly coming from Niger, Nigeria, and Burkina Faso, are expected to be deployed in the next couple of months and will presumably team with Malian soldiers to battle the rebels. Cooperation from the unoccupied areas of Mali however has proved to be difficult as the country is still somewhat unstable and disorganized as a result of the military coup and jihadist takeover in the North.
The decision to intervene seems to be a wise and proactive course for these countries to take. Ignoring the problem would only make things worse as it would allow the rebels to become more powerful and to expand their influence and organization. The area is already considered a terrorist sanctuary and safe haven and that would only spread, not only posing a threat to Africa but to the world as a whole. A soft approach could also set a bad precedent for the future that would only empower radical groups and could encourage an increase in these unlawful and forceful coups. While I agree with the decision for military intervention, as I suspect they are doing, I would hope that an attempt is being made to resolve this conflict through more diplomatic means as well such as economic sanctions or direct dialogue with the rebels. As with any situation, force should be a last resort. I also think the amount of troops that have been pledged to address the problem seems awfully small, especially given the number of countries involved in the operation. I understand reluctance to put more people in harms way but if the amount of force is not strong enough then it would be even more dangerous for the troops that are being deployed. You certainly do not want this turning into a full fledged war but still this approach seems like somewhat of a half-measure. 
Islamist fighters in Kidal in northern Mali (7 August 2012)
Militant islamists in northern Mali
While I’m all for a foreign policy that allows other regions to handle their own business, I’m also surprised that, given our interest in curbing Islamic extremism and our reputation as championing human rights, the western world has not taken a more active role with this situation. Thus far, the US has cut off some foreign aid to Mali and has used some diplomatic pressure to push for an invasion while France has been very outspoken regarding the threat but has pledged to help only through intelligence efforts. Perhaps this is a calculated effort by these countries as they would obviously prefer to have others take care of the dirty work plus military conflict can be very unpopular both at home and abroad.
These jihadist groups are an issue not only because of their extreme beliefs and the danger they pose but also simply based on the simple fact that their no good at governing. While perhaps the same criticism could be levied at much of the continent, as shown by the happenings in northern Mali as well as other past extremist strongholds such as Somalia, Islamist controlled areas are particularly rife with a lack of freedom, violence, lawlessness, and poverty. In northern Mali the economy has sharply declined and a strict form of Sharia Law has been implemented. Women must completely cover their bodies and faces, alcohol, music, and various forms of technology have been banned, non-Muslims are persecuted against, and people are whipped, stoned, or have limbs hacked off for petty crimes or violations of this Islamic rule. According to the UN, roughly 500,000 people, about 5% of the countries population, have either fled or been turned into refugees as a result of the occupation.
It will be interesting to see how the situation in Mali progresses over the next couple of months and how, if it all, the approach for dealing with the threat of both African and foreign countries evolves. Ideally, forceful intervention will not be necessary but assuming it is hopefully the conquest is successful and the threat posed by these radical jihadists is neutralized and stability, freedom, and some measure of prosperity is returned to this region.


Sources Used:

Boswel, Allen. November 12 2012. “Mali’s Looming War: Will Military Intervention Drive Out the Islamists?” Time World. Web. November 13 2012.                                                                                                                                      http://world.time.com/2012/11/12/malis-looming-war-will-military-intervention-drive-out-the-islamists/                                                       

Associated Press. November 12 2012. “West African bloc agrees on N. Mali troops.” CBS News. Web. November 13 2012.                                                                                                                                       http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-202_162-57548198/west-african-bloc-agrees-on-n-mali-troops/