African
Leaders Send Troops to Mali
I chose this week to write about Mali and the recent proposed intervention. Leaders
of 15 African countries have signed an agreement to intervene in Mali. Troops will be sent to the Islamist-run
Northern region of Mali. The Economic Community of Western States (ECOWAS) met
in Nigeria earlier this week for an emergency summit to plot a military
strategy seeking to wrest control of northern Mali back from Islamist groups.
According to the BBC, the plan covers a six-month period, with a preparatory
phase for training and for the establishment of bases in Mali's south, followed
by combat operations in the north.
The
UN has warned that the Islamist militias are imposing a harsh version of Shari’a
law on the areas they controlled and that forced marriage, forced prostitution,
and rape are becoming widespread. They also have earned international
condemnation for destroying ancient tombs recognized as UN World Heritage
sites, such as Timbuktu.
Since
the adoption of the resolution, the UN gave African leaders 45 days to draw up
a military plan for intervention.
Though it’s reported they were hoping for 5,500 troops, the summit’s
proposal commits just 3,300 troops, although it is assumed the UN still is looking
for countries to contribute more troops to the cause. The majority of the soldiers will come from Nigeria, Burkina
Faso, and Niger, but they cannot be deployed until the UN Security Council and
the African Union approves it. The UN vote is expected in the coming weeks,
aiming for mid-December.
Leaders
of African countries remain divided in their opinions. Nigerian President
Goodluck Jonathan said that forceful intervention was needed to avoid costly
consequences and that “Nigeria fully supports the recommendations of chiefs of
defense…for an intervention force to be immediately deployed to Mali to help
restore order and stability there.” However, non-ECOWAS member Algeria,
represented by Kalmal Rezzag Bara, a terrorism and security advisor to
Algeria’s President, seemed less certain. Bara said that Mali’s current state
is an “internal affair” and that ECOWAS “internationalizing the crisis would
only aggravate the situation.” He recommended that Mali should be assisted in
coming up with plan of action short of intervention to resolve the crisis. Initially, ECOWAS wanted to reach an
agreement with the rebels but, after months without result, the organization is
turning towards intervention. I think this is a very important story especially given Michael's heartbreak over Mali's rocky last year.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-20292797
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/africa/state-tv-west-african-leaders-agree-to-send-troops-to-wrest-control-in-north-mali/2012/11/11/810515f6-2c49-11e2-b631-2aad9d9c73ac_story.html
http://www.cnn.com/2012/11/11/world/africa/mali-international-troops/index.html
Very interesting blog post. I was recently reading about this on Google news and what happens in the coming months seems to be a tell tale sign for the future. That being said, I think you hit it right on the head when you said this is VERY IMPORTANT. An emerging problem within the international community, I hope the UN can come to some sort of "effective" means of attacking the conflict in Mali. You mention Nigerian intervention which seems to be in motion and the most reasonable current means of addressing this problem BUT I'm afraid if ECOWAS intervenes a perpetuation of violence could ensue. It'll be interesting to see the response of African leaders in the coming months and whether the divide between certain loyalists tends to shift depending upon certain factors being impresses (say international intervention). Without a doubt, Mali is a problem and it seems it isn't going away-it should be interesting to see if a "six month plan" will truly suffice.
ReplyDelete