Showing posts with label Health care. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Health care. Show all posts

Thursday, September 27, 2012

Right vs. Privilege: Africa’s Health Care




One of the most prevalent issues condemning Africa today is that of health care. The lack of health care throughout Africa is not only depleting the population, but it also places ramifications on the government that harbor very unstable conditions. I chose the topic of public health because I believe that health care concerns are what plague the continent and what ultimately stimulate the majority of conflicts in Africa. It all boils down to basic human needs; all humans deserve the right to life and when that is jeopardized, it can bring out animalistic actions that might otherwise never surface.

The potential for universal health care has recently surfaced as a viable method for providing basic human needs to the continent of Africa. Currently, health care resides in the private sector and therefore is very expensive and essentially unachievable to the poor populations. Since the poor and poverty stricken populations compromise the majority of Africa, it is feasible to assume that health care is by no means easily accessible. Therefore, we see skyrocketing rates of death by diseases, infections, viruses, etc. Death is rampant in all demographics of the population, i.e. men, women, and children.  With the initiation of universal health care among African countries, it will save countless lives and hinder the spread of diseases throughout the region (primarily the spread of HIV/AIDS). Health care will be more equitable and accessible due to the affordability which has previously been scarce (AllAfrica). Countries that have already begun the movement towards universal health care or have already implemented the method are Ghana, Rwanda, Nigeria, Kenya, Mali, and South Africa (Namuwaya). Due to poor levels of governance throughout the region the ability for implementation seems unlikely. However other countries have proposed a two-sector idea for providing health care, one optional private health care and another universal health care. South Africa is a country that exhibits this two-sector method of providing health care (AllAfrica).

We have learned that political instability via protests stem from an array of deprivations: economic deprivations, lack of public resources, poor living conditions, etc. If the public is poor and seemingly has unchangeable health conditions, then protests will inevitably rise when the public has nothing else to loose. By providing universal healthcare, the public will receive basic human needs that everyone should be entitled too. This public resource will raise their self-worth, hence increasing stable conditions within a state. From a human rights stand point, it seems to be a win-win situation. However, taxes will need to rise by an average of 11 percent (AllAfrica). Although this seems daunting and a bit steep, African countries have already attributed successful stories (AllAfrica). Therefore it seems quite possible across the board if governments stop allocating all state revenues between the hands of the few and release corruption to better this nation state’s well-being (the opposite of neopatrimonialism). Overly optimistic, perhaps? Lets hope not.


Article (no listed author)