Sunday, October 14, 2012


Northern Mali: International Intervention or Inaction?

2012 has been an extremely tumultuous year for the West African country. As the situation worsens in Northern Mali, the international community ponders on what steps to take to ensure political and overall stability in the region. After the coup d’état staged by the National Movement for the Liberation of Azawad (MNLA) and an Islamist group named Ansar Dine, President Amadou Toumani Toure was forced to step down in March and since then, Northern Mali has remained in a state of chaos.

Ansar Dine and other Islamist groups now rule over the majority of Northern Mali. They call for the implementation of Sharia Law and they impose strict rules on the people; for example, forcing women and girls to wear headscarves, conducting cruel punishments for premarital sex and smoking. The control that Ansar Dine has over the region is only becoming strong as more frustrated youth join the movement. International organizations, such as the U.N., the Economic Community of West African States, and neighboring countries (Cote d’Ivoire, Algeria, and Burkina Faso) have expressed interests in intervention. The rise of radical Islamism in Mali poses a major threat to Europe, considering its close proximity.

I chose to cover this issue because of last week’s theme of international intervention. Since the Islamists have an increasing amount of power in creating turmoil in Mali, should there be an intervention? This conflict has led to a humanitarian crisis and aid is much needed, but the question is would a military intervention need to happen also? France has proposed a UN Resolution that calls for a military intervention within 45 days, which the UN adopted. The Islamists responded with a threat to “open the doors of hell” for France.

I think in situations like this, any international action will be met with many difficulties. If France or other West African countries intervene, this will most likely lead to a brutal war with the Islamists. If they choose not to intervene, the Malian people will continue to suffer from the harsh rules imposed on them. Any decision is problematic, but it is probably safer for the problem to be dealt with militarily on a localized level, where opposing groups fight the Islamists. However, this does not answer the humanitarian issues that face the people. In this case, I would suggest international organizations to provide relief and aid assistance to the Malians.

Sources:



1 comment:

  1. Muna-

    Interesting decision between intervention and inaction, though I wonder how exactly international organizations can provide relief and aid assistance in this situation..What form would this take?

    ReplyDelete