Showing posts with label The Economist. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Economist. Show all posts

Thursday, September 20, 2012

Would you go to Timbuktu?

Sankore Mosque


Mali, located in West Africa, used to be a relatively stable nation and one of its main sources of income was tourists, mainly from western countries. This influx of foreign money didn’t make the majority of the population rich by any means, but it helped maintain at least one industry in the country. As noted in the article, even foreigners had opened businesses catering to tourists.

All this changed, however, after a coup in April of this year. Soldiers deposed the president and Mali hasn’t been the same since. Foreign governments, including the US, France and UK continue to advise citizens against travel to Mali and rebels still control two-thirds of the country. Even power in the government-controlled areas is tenuous. As a result, tourism in the country has dropped dramatically, creating an even bigger economic hardship in a country where many were struggling to begin with. The director of a museum near the capital said the lack of tourists was creating “an economic disaster.”

Political stability is one key to creating a viable economic environment for the citizens of a country. While Mali wasn’t booming to begin with, a military coup is calamitous for people struggling to make a living. Building a state is difficult and takes time and it is the ordinary citizens that struggle the most. With such uncertainty in Mali and multiple groups controlling different parts of the country, the legitimacy of any of them is likely questioned by the population. This adds further to the problems in a country and certainly will contribute to keeping tourists, and their valuable money, away. 

Image from Wikipedia.
Article from The Economist.  



Sunday, September 2, 2012

The Situation in Western Sahara

In preparation for the map quiz on Friday September 7th, a few of you have asked about the situation in Western Sahara and why it is classified as having multiple colonizers. Since we do not really get the chance to discuss Northern African politics in the class, I want to direct your attention to a new article published in one of The Economist's blogs about the current stalemate in the region. The article does not offer much in the way of new information, but does a good job of summarizing the issue.

It should also be noted that the dispute over territory and ownership can also be considered an example of the colonial legacies of the Europeans which we will be talking about in class this week. 

(image used under a creative commons license from Wikipedia)

For added fun, check out the comments. Unresolved contentious issues often lead to very strong arguments in an online forum about which side is "right."