Tuesday, October 9, 2012

A New President, a New Beginning: Senegal's Changing Political Situation


Senegal: President Describes 'Significant' Reform Agenda, Says Mali Must Be Reunited



Senegalese President Macky Sall
     
     Senegal has been labelled in the past as one of Africa's "most stable democracies" by the CIA, but it has not held on to this title with much ease in recent years. The previous Senegalese President Abdoulaye Wade marred the government system and increasingly tried to pass constitutional amendments in his favor. The East African Leadership Index's "F-" score of Wade was not unprecedented; Wade was petitioning for yet another change to the constitution that would allow him to run for a third term. When Senegalese Presidential terms are 7 years, that means Wade had already been in office 14 years. Fears of a transition back to authoritarianism were felt across the nation, and protests ensued.

    Finally, we turn to what may be defined as a positive story emanating from Africa's western coast. One of the first agenda items that Sall states in this interview is an aim to "improve democratic governance." Within this category he aims to set the term limit at two, five-year terms, including his own term. Another goal, however lofty, is to institute a universal healthcare program for all Senegalese. Given the current issues with healthcare decisions in the U.S, I find this goal to be slightly less believable, but it is an honorable one nonetheless. He also hopes to institute more vocational training schools for youth, begin a Family Security Fund (which would give poor women the opportunity to vaccinate and enroll their children in school), and formulate a solution to the recent upheavals in Mali.

    After reading extensive accounts of the injustices of President Wade, Sall's words feel refreshing and, in some cases, like attainable goals. However, this is not to say that all of these propositions will come to fruition, especially given recent regional instability with the coup in Mali. President Sall has not yet been tested on his individual political ability (though he was Prime Minister under Wade for three years). Many African leaders have come and gone with similarly positive outlooks without being able to properly execute their plans, often simply due to infrastructural faults. As we discussed in class, sometimes government issues date back to regimes that were put in place following colonialism. Though Senegal experienced an authoritarian regime at its inception, it has since had democratic leaders and even elections that have been deemed "free and fair." Since 2001, Senegal has risen significantly on the Policy Scale from an anocratic regime to a democratic one. 

     Why is this particular issue relevant to the international community? This case is hopefully one of many to come where countries are breaking from authoritarian (or potentially authoritarian, like Wade) rulers in favor of more democratic regimes. This often does not come without difficulty and as cases like Egypt might suggest, these transitions come much more slowly than populations generally have patience for. The hope is that Senegal has, for the time being, dodged a bullet (figuratively or literally!) by the recent election of Macky Sall. 


Source: http://allafrica.com/stories/201209281572.html
Source: http://www.freedomhouse.org/country/senegal
Source: http://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm

3 comments:

  1. Amanda - You bring up a good point by addressing this aspect of "a state transitioning to democracy". In the popular media, it seems that the idea of a state embracing democratic institutions is binary; a government is either democratic or not and a "path" towards democratic institutions is not even discussed.

    Ostensibly, many understand that democracy is not either absolute or absent. However, we continue to see media outlets publishing criticisms on transitional governments and collapsing regimes - both in North and Sub-Saharan Africa - attempting to explain that newly installed institutions are "refreshed autocracies" in nature and that this is somehow negative or detrimental to whatever state may be in question. I believe there needs to be more attention paid in the popular press to analyzing transitional regimes before they are pithily labelled as non-democratic or even hostile institutions.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The media especially towards Africa, is always half full. But as Amanda points out senegal has had great stability in the country since 2001. Sengal has taken a large step to stop authoritarianism by electing Sall. He was the Prime Minister when times were good, and has the experiance to keep the economy going (unless he greeds for power).

    I am not suprised the media is giving negative press because look at Africa in a whole, transitionsal regimes marked for terrible times for most countries. Because it usually was from Civil war or a turn to Authoritarianism. i believe that Senegal has a chance to stay democratic as long as there are free elections. Which is always a good sign for Sub-Saharan African countries.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Amanda-

    Great job of highlighting the complexity of modern democracy and applying it to the case of Senegal. Great structure and analysis

    ReplyDelete