Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Fundamental Democratic Change in Kenya


Starting in March of 2013, Kenyans will be electing the very first                senators, governors, and female representatives into the government thanks to the new decentralized system that is intended to increase representation and strengthen transparency within the government. This move to increase representation is also viewed by many in Kenya and around the world as a big step in the advancements of development in the country through improved public policy, as well a catalyst to increasing political involvement and accountability throughout the nation.
                I picked this particular article because in our readings on the effectiveness of democracy in Africa and our class discussions on what African regimes can do better to ensure the survival of democracy in their countries when we see retracting trends in states like Mali, it is critical for leadership to evolve ad grow to become more effective and accountable for their people and increasing avenues for greater representation in government is a great way to do so.
                We should care about this issue and particularly the success of issues such as these because for Africans to continue with the prospect of democracy even when there are slow results and stagnant problems within the country, they must feel that they have a hand in the governance of their country’s decisions and that all the policies and actions of the government support the best interests of all the people and not just a select few. The best way to build and strengthen this accountability in government is through increasing involvement in policy decisions by the people and thus creating a feeling of ownership and pride in the system that will be able to withstand tough times because of investments made by the population.
                The article addressed a number of things that could go wrong with the implementation of this system in Kenya, for example increased corruption, voting solely along identity and ethnic lines, and possible intrastate and/or interstate conflict due to the final results of the elections. Furthermore, given the history and mystery of general elections in Kenya in the past there is a definite need for concern on all sides of this issue and insuring that this process is handled smoothly and correctly should be a top priority of the international community within the next 6 months.
                In reference to policymakers current and future in Kenya, it should be their top priority to ensure stability and accountability into the government structure of Kenya and make sure that this election process is handled properly to minimize disputes over results. If done properly this fundamental change by the Kenyan people could mean a turn for the better in the effectiveness of rule and hopefully the overall development of the country and the region but if not handled properly we could see another key African state teetering on the brink of civil conflict.

Sources:
Nic. "DECENTRALIZATION, ELECTIONS AND THE ODM IN KENYA." Democracy in Africa. Web. 23 
     Oct. 2012.



2 comments:

  1. Nate-

    Interesting look at how decentralization of voting might help improve stability. But I want to know- do you thin this is a move in the right direction? Dont hesitate to insert your own beliefs into the overview!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Even if the elections are done properly do you think there is still a chance for conflict? Many countries who have decentralized governments or small coalitions governing different areas have conflict between groups. I am also curious how decentralization leads to transparency in the government?

    ReplyDelete